FirePro M4150 vs FirePro W7170M
When comparing FirePro M4150 and FirePro W7170M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and FirePro W7170M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | FirePro W7170M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FirePro W7170M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and FirePro W7170M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FirePro W7170M - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 8 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and FirePro W7170M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and FirePro W7170M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 237% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | FirePro W7170M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Opal | Tonga |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |