FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 940MX
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce 940MX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and GeForce 940MX.
FirePro M4150
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 940MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 940MX has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 940MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 407 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce 940MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 and GeForce 940MX is 4000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce 940MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Fortnite is 47% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 940MX | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Opal | N16S-GTR-B/S |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 10 March 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1122 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 23.83 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |