FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 9800 GTX
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce 9800 GTX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and GeForce 9800 GTX.
FirePro M4150
GeForce 9800 GTX
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 9800 GTX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce 9800 GTX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 511 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 9800 GTX - with Tesla.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 973 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce 9800 GTX - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2900 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 9800 GTX | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Opal | G92 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 28 March 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1688 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 754 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 43.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 432.1 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 70.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |