FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and GeForce 9800M GT SLI. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce 9800M GT SLI. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 9800M GT SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 511 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 9800M GT SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 9800M GT SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 215 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce 9800M GT SLI - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce 9800M GT SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Dota 2 is 10% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Fortnite is 31% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 116% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 9800M GT SLI | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Code name | Opal | NB9E-GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 15 July 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1508 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |