FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GT 750M
When comparing FirePro M4150 and GeForce GT 750M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GT 750M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GT 750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GT 750M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 750M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 750M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 750M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 252 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GT 750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 20% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GT 750M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | N14P-GT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 30.94 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 - 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.19 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |