FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4150 stacks up against GeForce GTX 285M SLI, check out specs charts below.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 139 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2980 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 143% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 188% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 58% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Code name | Opal | N10E-GTX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1508 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |