FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 295
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 295 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 295 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1791 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 527 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 3001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 15% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Opal | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |