FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 560M
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 560M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 560M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 560M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1535 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 560M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 560M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 60 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 560M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Fortnite is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Opal | N12E-GS |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 30 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 24.8 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |