FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 660M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 660M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 660M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 660M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 660M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 660M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 660M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 660M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 120 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 660M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 660M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Fortnite is 42% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in World of Tanks is 20% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 660M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | N13E-GE |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 835 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 30.4 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 729.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |