FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 670M
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 670M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 670M.
FirePro M4150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 117 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 670M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 63% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Opal | N13E-GS1-LP |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 598 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 33.5 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |