FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 675M SLI will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M SLI here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 95 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 1000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 128% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Dota 2 is 106% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Fortnite is 212% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Minecraft is 27% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 540% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Opal | N12E-GTX2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |