FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 680M
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 680M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 680M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 680M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 680M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 680M is 5 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 680M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Dota 2 is 93% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Fortnite is 187% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Minecraft is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Opal | N13E-GTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 4 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 80.6 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 100 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- FirePro M4150 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M