FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 765M
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 765M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 765M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 765M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 765M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 765M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 765M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 135 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 765M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 84% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | N14-GE |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 30 May 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 55.23 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |