FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 950M
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 950M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 950M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 950M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 or GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 950M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 950M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 950M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950M is 199 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 950M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Fortnite is 143% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 950M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Opal | N16P-GT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 12 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 914 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 44.96 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1000 or 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 32 or 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |