FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 980M
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 980M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 980M.
FirePro M4150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 980M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 980M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 980M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 980M | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 980M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 980M has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 980M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 980M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 980M is 323 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 980M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 980M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 716% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Battlefield 5 is 766% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 980M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Dota 2 is 139% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Far Cry 5 is 1150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Fortnite is 475% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Forza Horizon 4 is 785% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Grand Theft Auto V is 372% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Metro Exodus is 1433% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Minecraft is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1240% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in World of Tanks is 70% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 980M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Opal | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 7 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 51.84 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 3,462 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |