FirePro M4150 vs GRID K280Q

When comparing FirePro M4150 and GRID K280Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and GRID K280Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro M4150

GRID K280Q

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	GRID K280Q
Power consumption (TDP)		225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K280Q has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 30 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
FirePro M4150 and GRID K280Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	24−27
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	5−6	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	6−7	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	120−130	180−190
medium / 768p	90−95	150−160
ultra / 1080p	35−40	80−85
QHD / 1440p	21−24	45−50
4K / 2160p	16−18	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
medium / 768p	45−50	80−85
ultra / 1080p	20−22	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
4K / 2160p	2−3	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	30−35
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
QHD / 1440p	3−4	−
low / 720p	50−55	85−90
medium / 1080p	10−12	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 115% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	3−4	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	8−9	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	−	65−70
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	1−2	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	4−5	21−24
medium / 1080p	3−4	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	95−100
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	40−45
medium / 768p	8−9	27−30
high / 1080p	4−5	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	95−100
medium / 768p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	GRID K280Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Opal	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	16 October 2013	28 June 2013
Pipelines	384	1536
Core clock speed	715 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16	95.36
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FirePro M4150 vs GRID K280Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares