FirePro M4150 vs GRID M6 8Q

When comparing FirePro M4150 and GRID M6 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and GRID M6 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro M4150

GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	GRID M6 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)		100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID M6 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 7 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
FirePro M4150 and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	14−16	60−65
medium / 1080p	6−7	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M4150 and GRID M6 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	220−230
medium / 768p	90−95	190−200
ultra / 1080p	35−40	110−120
QHD / 1440p	21−24	75−80
4K / 2160p	16−18	40−45
high / 768p	65−70	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 126% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	20−22	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 106% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	10−12	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	60−65
medium / 1080p	8−9	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	1−2	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than FirePro M4150.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	65−70
medium / 768p	8−9	40−45
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 58% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	GRID M6 8Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Opal	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	16 October 2013	30 August 2015
Pipelines	384	1536
Core clock speed	715 MHz	722 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16	69.31
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops	2,218 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2

FirePro M4150 vs GRID M6 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares