FirePro M4150 vs GRID M60 2Q

When choosing between FirePro M4150 and GRID M60 2Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and GRID M60 2Q.

FirePro M4150

GRID M60 2Q

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	GRID M60 2Q
Power consumption (TDP)		225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M60 2Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID M60 2Q has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 158 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
FirePro M4150 and GRID M60 2Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	12−14	60−65
medium / 1080p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	14−16	100−110
medium / 1080p	6−7	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M4150 and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	250−260
medium / 768p	90−95	220−230
ultra / 1080p	35−40	180−190
QHD / 1440p	21−24	110−120
4K / 2160p	16−18	70−75
high / 768p	65−70	210−220
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	110−120
ultra / 1080p	20−22	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 139% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	2−3	45−50
ultra / 1080p	2−3	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	10−12	80−85
medium / 1080p	3−4	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	3−4	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	50−55	180−190
medium / 1080p	10−12	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	3−4	30−35
4K / 2160p	2−3	24−27
low / 720p	18−20	100−110
medium / 1080p	8−9	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	45−50	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	4−5	70−75
ultra / 1080p	2−3	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	1−2	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	4−5	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	130−140
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 44% more, than FirePro M4150.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	6−7	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	130−140
medium / 768p	8−9	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	45−50
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
4K / 2160p	1−2	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
high / 768p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 71% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	GRID M60 2Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Opal	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	16 October 2013	30 August 2015
Pipelines	384	2048
Core clock speed	715 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16	150.8
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2

FirePro M4150 vs GRID M60 2Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares