FirePro M4150 vs GRID M60 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and GRID M60 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and GRID M60 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
GRID M60 8Q
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 158 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- FirePro M4150 and GRID M60 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and GRID M60 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 112% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 237% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Opal | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |