FirePro M4150 vs HD Graphics 4400
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and HD Graphics 4400, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and HD Graphics 4400.
FirePro M4150
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | HD Graphics 4400 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and HD Graphics 4400 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 4400 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 4400 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 515 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 4400 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 136% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 22% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | HD Graphics 4400 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | Opal | Haswell GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 22.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 46 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |