FirePro M4150 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro M4150

Iris Plus Graphics 645 Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:

Iris Plus Graphics 645 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	Iris Plus Graphics 645
Power consumption (TDP)		15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 415 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	4−5
ultra / 1080p	0−1	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	12−14
medium / 1080p	3−4	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than FirePro M4150.
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	16−18
medium / 1080p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	100−110
medium / 768p	90−95	80−85
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
QHD / 1440p	21−24	24−27
4K / 2160p	16−18	−
high / 768p	65−70	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	75−80	65−70
medium / 768p	45−50	45−50
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	2−3	5−6
ultra / 1080p	2−3	5−6
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	10−12	12−14
medium / 1080p	3−4	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	8−9
QHD / 1440p	3−4	−
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	10−12	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 5% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	8−9
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	16−18
medium / 1080p	8−9	9−10
FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	45−50	40−45
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	4−5	7−8
ultra / 1080p	2−3	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	35−40	−
FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p	1−2	3−4
ultra / 1080p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	4−5	7−8
medium / 1080p	3−4	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
high / 1080p	80−85	80−85
ultra / 1080p	70−75	70−75
medium / 1080p	85−90	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	24−27
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M4150.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	16−18
medium / 768p	8−9	12−14
high / 1080p	4−5	6−7
ultra / 1080p	4−5	5−6
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	80−85
medium / 768p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
high / 768p	30−35	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	Iris Plus Graphics 645
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Code name	Opal	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	16 October 2013	10 July 2019
Pipelines	384	48
Core clock speed	715 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16	50.40
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.103
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares