FirePro M4150 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 415 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 43% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 78% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 15% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Opal | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 950A
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 960A