FirePro M4150 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4150 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4150 stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 5200, check out specs charts below.
FirePro M4150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 515 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 78% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 15% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Opal | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon RX 550X
- FirePro M4150 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book