FirePro M4150 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro M4150

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 315 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	14−16	70−75
medium / 1080p	6−7	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 444% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M4150 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	230−240
medium / 768p	90−95	200−210
ultra / 1080p	35−40	120−130
QHD / 1440p	21−24	100−110
4K / 2160p	16−18	55−60
high / 768p	65−70	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	110−120
ultra / 1080p	20−22	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 127% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	2−3	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	10−12	55−60
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	10−12	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 268% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	18−20	75−80
medium / 1080p	8−9	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	4−5	45−50
ultra / 1080p	2−3	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	1−2	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	4−5	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	75−80
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	6−7	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	80−85
medium / 768p	8−9	50−55
high / 1080p	4−5	27−30
ultra / 1080p	4−5	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	Opal	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	16 October 2013	15 August 2020
Pipelines	384	96
Core clock speed	715 MHz	400 MHz
Boost Clock		1350 MHz
Transistor count	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares