FirePro M4150 vs P106 100
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and P106 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others P106 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
P106 100
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | P106 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and P106 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P106 100 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 791 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 4008 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and P106 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | P106 100 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Opal | GP106 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 19 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 136.7 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |