FirePro M4150 vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro FX 3800 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 115 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M4150 and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Opal | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |