FirePro M4150 vs Quadro K2100M
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2100M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 48 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 36% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 116% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | GK106 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |