FirePro M4150 vs Quadro K2200M

When comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2200M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2200M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro M4150

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)		65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 48 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	20−22
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	14−16	65−70
medium / 1080p	6−7	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	230−240
medium / 768p	90−95	200−210
ultra / 1080p	35−40	110−120
QHD / 1440p	21−24	85−90
4K / 2160p	16−18	45−50
high / 768p	65−70	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	20−22	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	50−55
medium / 1080p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	120−130
medium / 1080p	10−12	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 237% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	12−14
4K / 2160p	2−3	12−14
low / 720p	18−20	65−70
medium / 1080p	8−9	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	4−5	40−45
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	1−2	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	70−75
medium / 768p	8−9	45−50
high / 1080p	4−5	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Opal	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	16 October 2013	19 July 2014
Pipelines	384	640
Core clock speed	715 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16	26.68
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

FirePro M4150 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares