FirePro M4150 vs Quadro K5000M
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro K5000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro K5000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro K5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 9 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro K5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 93% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 181% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro K5000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | N14E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 67.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |