FirePro M4150 vs Quadro M1000M
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Quadro M1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M1000M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 278 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 93% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 175% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 420% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 64% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Opal | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |