FirePro M4150 vs Quadro M2200
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro M2200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and Quadro M2200.
FirePro M4150
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 21 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 1508 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 455% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 275% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 833% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 680% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Opal | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |