FirePro M4150 vs Quadro M520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro M520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro M520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro M520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro M520 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 41 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro M520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Fortnite is 78% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro M520 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Opal | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 756 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 40 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |