FirePro M4150 vs Quadro P3200
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Quadro P3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6084 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6083 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 7 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 3008 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| FirePro M4150 and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 1175% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 487% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 814% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 377% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 1466% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1183% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1280% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Opal | N18E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 27 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |