FirePro M4150 vs Quadro T1000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro T1000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro T1000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 680 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Opal | TU117 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |