FirePro M4150 vs Radeon 520
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Radeon 520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon 520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon 520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon 520 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon 520 are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 315 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 1750 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon 520 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Opal | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
| Check Price |