FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 260X
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 260X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 260X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Main Specs
FirePro M4150
Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
50−55
medium / 1080p
6−7
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
90−95
180−190
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
21−24
55−60
4K / 2160p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
65−70
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
95−100
ultra / 1080p
20−22
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 93% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
2−3
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
40−45
medium / 1080p
3−4
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
10−11
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
10−12
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 181% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
5−6
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
−
75−80
high / 1080p
4−5
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
4−5
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 22% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−33
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 416% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
9−10
55−60
medium / 768p
8−9
35−40
high / 1080p
4−5
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro M4150.
Full Specs
FirePro M4150
Radeon R7 260X
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 2.0
Code name
Opal
Bonaire
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
16 October 2013
8 October 2013
Pipelines
384
896
Core clock speed
715 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.16
61.60
Floating-point performance
549.1 gflops
1,971 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
104 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
225 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
5.16 Mh/s
Check Price
