FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R8 M365DX
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R8 M365DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R8 M365DX.
FirePro M4150
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R8 M365DX is 5 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R8 M365DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 3200 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Opal | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 3 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |