FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 M275
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 210 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Opal | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |