FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 M395X
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M395X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M395X.
FirePro M4150
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 8 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 477% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 127% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 725% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 300% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 485% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 250% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Opal | Amethyst XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 16 October 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |