FirePro M5100 vs FireStream 9250
When choosing between FirePro M5100 and FireStream 9250, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5100 and FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5100 | FireStream 9250 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FireStream 9250 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5100 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9250 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9250 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 100 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FirePro M5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9250 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 2514 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Battlefield 5 is 144% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Dota 2 is 42% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Far Cry 5 is 180% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Fortnite is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in World of Tanks is 27% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5100 | FireStream 9250 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Venus | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 16 June 2008 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 1,000.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1986 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 63.55 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |