FirePro M5100 vs FireStream 9270
When comparing FirePro M5100 and FireStream 9270, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5100 and FireStream 9270 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5100 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FireStream 9270 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5100 and FireStream 9270 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9270 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9270 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9270 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 900 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5100 and FireStream 9270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5100 | FireStream 9270 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Venus | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 13 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 30.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |