FirePro M5100 vs GeForce 920A
In this comparison between FirePro M5100 and GeForce 920A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 920A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5100 | GeForce 920A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce 920A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro M5100 and GeForce 920A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 920A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 920A - with Kepler 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 229 MHz higher, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 and GeForce 920A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 2498 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 342% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Dota 2 is 200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Fortnite is 250% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in World of Tanks is 156% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5100 | GeForce 920A | |
Architecture | GCN | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Venus | GK208B |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2013 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 954 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 30.53 |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |