FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 850A
When choosing between FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 850A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 850A.
GeForce GTX 850A
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 850A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 850A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 850A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 177 MHz higher, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 850A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 2700 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Fortnite is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 850A | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Venus | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 936 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 37.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |