FirePro M5100 vs Quadro 2000D
When comparing FirePro M5100 and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5100 and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5100 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- FirePro M5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 1900 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M5100 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Fortnite is 94% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Venus | GF106 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |