FirePro M5100 vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between FirePro M5100 and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5100 and Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5100 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 125 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- FirePro M5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 2900 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M5100 and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Fortnite is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 316% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Metro Exodus is 2000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 850% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Venus | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |