FirePro M5100 vs Quadro M500M

In this comparison between FirePro M5100 and Quadro M500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro M5100 Check Price

Quadro M500M Check Price

FirePro M5100 and Quadro M500M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: FirePro M5100 and Quadro M500M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 or Quadro M500M here:

FirePro M5100 Laptops

Quadro M500M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M5100	Quadro M500M
Power consumption (TDP)		30 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro M5100 and Quadro M500M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 304 MHz higher, than FirePro M5100.
FirePro M5100 and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 496 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	0−1
ultra / 1080p	6−7	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 112% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	16−18	5−6
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	16−18
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100.
low / 768p	170−180	110−120
medium / 768p	140−150	85−90
ultra / 1080p	70−75	40−45
QHD / 1440p	40−45	35−40
4K / 2160p	30−33	18−20
high / 768p	100−110	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
FirePro M5100 and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	75−80	50−55
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Dota 2 is 48% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	12−14	1−2
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	10−12
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	18−20	9−10
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	75−80	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	20−22	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	65−70	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
high / 1080p	20−22	6−7
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	7−8	1−2
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	6−7
medium / 1080p	9−10	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	24−27
medium / 1080p	20−22	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	12−14	5−6
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	6−7
medium / 1080p	12−14	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	35−40	14−16
medium / 768p	24−27	10−11
high / 1080p	12−14	5−6
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 162% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	14−16
high / 768p	45−50	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5100 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Quadro M500M.

Full Specs

	FirePro M5100	Quadro M500M
Architecture	GCN	Maxwell
Code name	Venus	GM108
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 October 2013	15 December 2015
Pipelines	640	384
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1029 MHz
Boost Clock	775 MHz	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	31.00	17.98
Floating-point performance	992.0 gflops	863.2 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	4004 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	108 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Optimus		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M5100 vs Quadro M500M

FirePro M5100 and Quadro M500M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares