FirePro M5100 vs Tesla M6
When choosing between FirePro M5100 and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5100 and Tesla M6.
Tesla M6
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 205 MHz higher, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M5100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 290% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 240% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 264% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 197% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 288% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 207% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 272% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Venus | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |