FirePro M4150 vs FirePro M5950
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and FirePro M5950 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others FirePro M5950 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | FirePro M5950 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FirePro M5950 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro M4150 and FirePro M5950 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and FirePro M5950 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FirePro M5950 - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 10 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FirePro M5950 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 3100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 25% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| FirePro M4150 and FirePro M5950 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | FirePro M5950 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | Opal | Whistler-XT |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 13 April 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 17.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 57 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |