FirePro M5950 vs FirePro S10000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and FirePro S10000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and FirePro S10000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | FirePro S10000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 2042% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FirePro S10000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro S10000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and FirePro S10000 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and FirePro S10000 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 4100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| FirePro M5950 and FirePro S10000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | FirePro S10000 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Tahiti |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 12 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 106.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2x 3,405 gflops |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 480 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | n/a | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 383 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | full height / full length |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |