FirePro M5950 vs GeForce 825M
When comparing FirePro M5950 and GeForce 825M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5950 and GeForce 825M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M5950 and GeForce 825M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M5950 and GeForce 825M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 or GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
GeForce 825M
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
33 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M5950 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce 825M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce 825M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 825M - in Laptops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce 825M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 125 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 825M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce 825M is 900 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
2−3
medium / 1080p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 650% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
35−40
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M5950 and GeForce 825M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
55−60
medium / 768p
95−100
30−33
ultra / 1080p
45−50
6−7
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
high / 768p
70−75
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
medium / 768p
50−55
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−33
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
14−16
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
−
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
18−20
medium / 768p
40−45
−
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
1−2
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
9−10
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
85−90
80−85
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
75−80
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Minecraft is 22% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
27−30
10−11
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 120% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 720p
9−10
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
20−22
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
40−45
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
0−1
high / 768p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
GeForce 825M
Architecture
Terascale 2
Kepler
Code name
Whistler-XT
GK208
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
13 April 2011
27 January 2014
Pipelines
480
384
Core clock speed
725 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
915 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
30.11
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
722.7 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
Form factor
MXM-A
Check Price
Check Price